Hacker News Reader

I agree, but absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, and we currently have a lot of developers who feel very productive right now.

We are very much in need of an actual way to measure real economic impact of AI-assisted coding, over both shorter and longer time horizons.

There's been an absolute rash of vibecoded startups. Are we seeing better success rates or sales across the industry?

View on HN

> "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

That's the same false argument that the religious have offered for their beliefs and was debunked by Bertrand Russell's teapot argument: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot

I'm not speaking of burdens of proof about unfalsifiable statements.

I'm saying that I think this is an important enough question that I think we should seek real evidence in either direction, especially since apparently everyone already has a strong opinion (warranted or not.)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com