Hacker News Reader

Comment by pepperoni_pizza | Hacker News Reader

I already noticed that. When I feel lazy, I feel like reaching for the AI. Exactly the same laziness voice that nudges me to drive instead of walking.

But then I go running and swimming for fun, and there is no laziness voice there, telling me to stop, because I enjoy it. And similarly with AI, I only use it for things where I don't care about, like various corporate bs. Maybe the cure for AI-brain is to care about and be passionate about things.

Conversely, does this mean that the kind of people who use AI for everything don't care about anything?

View on HN

There's something interesting I've found about my interactions with the AI - I use it as a thought-partner. I don't ask it to solve a problem for me (well, first at least!) I think about it as a tool to work with, engage with the problem, and spit out a result that I then test and review.

I see it as part of the feedback loop, and it speeds up some of the mechanical drudgery, while not removing any of the semantic problems inherent in problem solving. In other words, there's things machines are good at, and things humans are good at - if we each stick to our strengths, we can move incredibly fast.

I've been using Claude to vibe code my game ideas for the past months (iterated with docs).

I find when I think of it as a being named "Claude," like a juniour partner who's there to eagerly help me, I get lazy. I think of it as if it's a real almost slave-like creature, who's there to make everything for me without any regards to himself.

But, when I think of it as a tool, as if its a hammer or something, I feel much less lazy. I think of it as "building something" using a program, not telling "Claude" what to do and expecting it to happen. I even turn off Claude's verbal responses completely sometimes to help this. 100% impersonal.

That is why i compare it to fast-food. From time to time you enjoy it but you should not consume it too much ;)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com