Hacker News Reader

Titles are editorialised and space limited. The first couple lines in the article linked above make the nuance pretty clear.

[edit: 'pretty' instead of 'perfectly']

You are defending not just clickbait, but libelous clickbait.

It's only libelous if it's not true. This vulnerability says otherwise.

It is libelous because it is a claim that "X said Y", not "Y".

Ah, so you're worried about the review team being misrepresented, not that Azure is shit.

I doubt this reaches the bar for libel by a long shot.