It truly is disappointing to read comments like this. The content [of your comment] isn't abjectly worthless, it's just wrapped in unnecessary hatefulness that honestly does nothing to further a high quality of discussion. Can't we do better here?
I certainly agree we could do better here but I'm not sure letting this calibre of "journalism" and the people who lap it up slide is the solution.
This content doesn't even fuel discussion. We see it almost every day under a different headline, all it does is trigger some genius to tell us how copying isn't stealing, copyright should be abolished and bla bla bla. It's digg content, and it's written to be agreed with not discussed.
So flag it and move on: if you must comment, you can do so sans ad hominem and still communicate your point.
I don't understand why a complaint about quality should itself be a paragon of lowered quality?