Imprison based on what and seize assets based on what exactly?
You not liking the administration is not a valid reason for asset seizure
And the asset seizure would be for the proceeds of all the open bribery, at the very least.
They were tried after being beaten militarily, who will lead the rebellion against Trump and the American military backing him? The military doesn't dislike what he does and those are the main ones that could oppose him.
But ultimately, it's the people of the US who have to do this. You're absolutely right that nobody else is going to do it for them.
This is such a long-standing problem that people no longer even notice the crimes happening right in front of their eyes. It's just become normal.
Our president should be boring and relatively quiet. Congress should be our focus, not the president.
You're going to have to specify a framework if you want to make statements about legality.
First, not US but Presidency and second, breaking Constitution is not very legal last time I checked but I could be wrong... /s
again, you are saying something is legal that is both clearly illegal and unconstitutional. you can say "it is illegal but we have no way to enforce since our congress and senate do not work for the people but are simple extension of a given political party in power" but you can't say that it is legal
Thus, US law, too, defers to international law.
Please at least read the legal framework you're so confidently misdescribing.
That's obviously not how things work. If you don't obey the law, you are a criminal. That's the whole point of laws.
You might not care about the rules, but the rest of the world takes notice. This is how you break a world order carefully designed to further your own interests.
The problem is: over time the US grew so powerful, that the definition of "war" became blurry. "No, we are not at war, our soldiers are just dropping bombs on Iran for fun and profit".
EDIT: Another problem, of course, is that current member of Congress have no balls to stand up to Trump and reclaim their constitutional powers.
Well you can say the same about Putin then. All nice and dandy
Yes
> And of course he can be declared national threat and foreign agent
There is no evidence of that he is a foreign agent and there is no legal procedure (nor should there be) for declaring someone a "national threat."
> When there’s choice between the bad (block Trump and allies) and the worse (his ideas stay alive even if he is no longer in business)
This is inevitable and any government that tries to act against holders of an idea is a tyranny
> Legal matters are secondary, as long as majority is convinced that justice is served.
That is mob justice
This isnt a conspiracy. Epstein was an israeli agent and him and trump were bffs for years. Trumps family is also heavily in debt to Russia and theyve been very open about it.
You seem to be a weird trump supporter who is mildly trolling by saying false stuff like the iran war isnt illegal when it very clearly is. Your comments are either very ignorant or youre trolling. The only folks still defending trump are p silly folks. The evidence is overwhelming at this point.
Civil forfeiture would do just fine. Such a wonderful tool. /s