That is not remotely the case for anyone who produces quality work.
If you care about quality you absolutely can guide a machine to produce that for you without writing a single line of code yourself.
And I expect the amount of guidance needed will continue to drop.
In my experience the people who care the most about code readability tend to be the people most opinionated on having the right abstractions, which are historically not available in Go.
I just happen to read what the machine writes, which is a way to both learn and inspect. So yes, I care about the code being relatively (and I stress relatively) easy to read. Go is ok there.