Seems a huge assumption to me. From the data one could equally conclude that JavaScript and Python have lower code quality _because_ the quantity of training data, e.g. more code written by less experienced developers
Weren't we taught that recycling is good?
We're getting drowned by "good enough". Not "good" mind you, just "good enough".
Any methodology or tool, really. Eventually, we're all just participating in cargo cults.
Well, the AI can at least be constrained to "the code actually compiles, runs, and produces the correct output."
The number of internet answers that can't pass that bar is distressingly high.
I mean, I guess I interpreted the chart in tfa to indicate that this doesn't always happen.
For example, "burn, then rape, pillage, and plunder" never works out quite right.