They are attacking close friends who literally harbor the armies attacking Iran.
The logic seems very straight forward imho. Attack the US army bases and pester the nations that allows those bases in hopes that they might ask the us to get bend.
The logic seems very straight forward imho. Attack the US army bases and pester the nations that allows those bases in hopes that they might ask the us to get bend.
Next time all the gulf countries will know: get America and everyone else to launch attacks against Iran from your soil. Make sure to participate. Why? Iran will attack everyone regardless of alliances, who attacks, whether anyone attacks at all, what bases exist, whether or not they participate, or whether they avoid hostilities. So obviously, it's better to be part of the hostilities against Iran, to have an army on your soil that will protect at least some of your territory.
What US/Israel assets are in Afghanistan?
> Just today the US told all US citizens to leave Iraq.
Isn't that pretty standard practice when there's a war on?
When did Iran attack Afghanistan? I've never heard of this and googling does not return anything.
I don't know, but the GGGP comment mentioned it, and the comment I responded too left it completely unaddressed, referring to countries with "US/Israel assets."
Yeah, that's because about the Taliban took it over about 5 minutes after the US left Afghanistan a few years ago. It was a complete mess.
So you really can’t say with that level of confidence if they’ve hit those.
You probably meant Azerbaijan, which is the only country without US assets that Iran attacked (once, then apologised, and explained that the losses in the military leadership created special issues with the military orders, which, fair).
Also an Iranian cell was caught planning an attack on an oil pipeline in Azerbaijan.
Previously two years ago Iran had attacked Pakistan, a nuclear armed nation. The only thing clear here is what would be the result of a nuclear Iran