Was this a condition of the plea bargain, or is this just something that is common in the UK?
And the issue is that Apple has effectively committed libel against Samsung in the UK with its repeated claims that the Samsung tablet is a copy of the iPad. This claim has turned out to be legally false, and now Apple is obliged to correct any turn of public opinion against Samsung that it instigated by making this false claim in the first place.
The reason people are upset about the oppressive libel laws is that they suppress true factual speech. Libel is supposed to be about falsehoods.
This just shows how much of a joke the UK legal system is.
And you guys getting excited about where the notice appears on the page shows just what petty and petulant jokes you are.
the contrary, the court has explicitly found that Samsung did not infringe, so it is indeed libel.
This just shows how much of a joke the UK legal system is.
That "joke" provides the foundation for the American legal system as well as that of all commonwealth countries, are those legal systems jokes too? If the court had ruled in Apple's favour would you still be posting here calling the UK legal system a joke? (this is a rhetorical question)
And you guys getting excited about where the notice appears on the page shows just what petty and petulant jokes you are.
Hello pot, meet kettle