Fewer people want guns than want to vote.
Consequences of errors with guns are higher than with voting, because elections are audited and mistakes and fraud are found and reversed.
You cannot helpfully audit misuse of guns, after the fact.
Consequences of errors with guns are higher than with voting, because elections are audited and mistakes and fraud are found and reversed.
You cannot helpfully audit misuse of guns, after the fact.
But lets accept your premise as true.
You're proposing something like rank-stacking the risk of various rights of citizens and people and if they're high enough on the stack it's OK to to ID and if they're lower maybe it's not OK. That seems to move the goalpost quite a bit from your prior argument.
This happens before the winners are certified, and before they're given the ability to drop bombs.
I don't understand your confusion.
In the US, ACH transactions are reversible and trusted throughout the nation. Bitcoin transactions are not, and are not. This seems parallel to me.