It's also the optimal age to have children. Fertility is highest, the woman is likely healthy and strong, lowest risk of complications.
> Biological optimal vs societal optimal
to
> Biological optimal vs personal optimal
Put in a catchier way, if nothing is worth dying for, then nothing is worth living for either.
I think you'll find this is a very old viewpoint. As is the smear that we reject any care or duty for society. "This may seem harsh and stubborn and unconciliatory; but it is to treat with the utmost kindness and consideration the only spirit that can appreciate or deserves it."
"Figuring out your life" was not a thing when humans evolved.
not really, overall the life expectancy is growing well over 80 years old. unless you live, like, in the woods and feed off berries and hunting or something like that.
and yeah sure there might be somebody that loses their parents at 15, absolutely. i'm sorry for them, but they are not statistically representative in any way.
I have a couple of friends married for about 4-5 years, with a 4-years old son and a one year old daughter. They both have graduate degrees and stable jobs. They are near 40 years old.
Man, they are two zombies. They are drained. They push forward for the immense love of their kids but it’s incredibly evident they’re drained.
And the thing is… having kids at almost 40 should really be discouraged. They simply don’t have the same energy they had when they were 20, of course. Heck, i’m 33 and it’s evident to me I don’t have the same energy as when I was 23.
This modern idea that one should postpone having kids is incredibly stupid, I hope at some point society will self-correct somehow.
At the end of the day it’s a moot point. You can’t pick when you find love and a suitable partner. :)
that's a moot point as well.
people find suitable partners all the time, but they don't even take having kids in consideration before a certain age