Analysis Suggests School Was Hit Amid U.S. Strikes on Iranian Naval Base
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
Well you can't be too careful when it comes to bombing school children!
Does anyone take this sort of mealy-mouthed reporting seriously these days?
Please enjoy the passive voice, the vague implications, the distancing. Hey things can go a bit wrong in a bombing campaign of abject choice!
Take it from Leavitt and the-buck-stops-somewhere-well-below-him-unless-its-effusive-praise-or-a-medal-Trump:
The U.S. would never target a school unless it intended to, therefore the U.S. could not have bombed that school. QED. Unless it intended to.
And Israel would never bomb a school just once, it would bomb it, wait until first responders come and bomb it again.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/11/us/politics/iran-school-m...
The times is quite good at representing information accurately and "analysis suggests" is a clearly worded way of them saying "we're pretty sure but we don't have enough evidence to say for certain".
https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/2030051395294941427
PS. This thread will be marked as dead very soon.