Your Rate - A better way to calculate your hourly freelance rate
yourrate.co
yourrate.co
If I'm a basic HTML developer with simple Dreamweaver skills from 1999, living in a major metro area, what I'm "worth" might really be something like $10-12/hour (in the US). The skills you have that are in demand dictate 'worth' in the market. And really, it's how an employer can translate those skills in to value in their marketplace that dictates the worth to them. If they're paying $5000 for website feature X, they reasonably assume they will get far more value than $5000 over a reasonable time frame (month? 6 months? 1 year?)
Being able to determine the value your skills brings to an employer is difficult, because it's not just your skills - you're reliant on them to be able to translate your labor in to money and they may suck at it. I've hired super talented people that I subsequently had to let go because I couldn't convert their awesome in to money.
Finding employers that are good at that, and that derive a lot of value from what you provide is a harder problem to solve, but more rewarding financially in the end.
Reading "million dollar consulting" (allan weiss) changed a lot of my thinking on this subject. It feels a bit dated now, but conceptually thinking about value instead of time for money, even if time for money is all you can get, still changes your perspective some.
Gentle plug: http://indieconf.com - coming up in just a couple weeks - will cover topics like these (specifically a session on "science of pricing" with Brennan Dunn) for freelancers.
Your rate is set by the market, not by your "reasonable" desired salary is.
In case you're wondering at this point: I think you should be charging more than this tool says you should. And, obviously, I don't think you should be billing people by the hour at all.
It certainly ought not be. That your rate resembles the market is a CONSEQUENCE, not a driver. The driver of your rate needs to be based upon the value of your services. Are you going to enable a company to make $500,000 more next year? Then if they want to pay you $50/hr because it's 'market rate', you need to tell them to kiss your ass.
The presumption is that everyone is already doing this, and that everyone has a reasonably correct understanding of what the actual value of their work is. This is a false presumption, but it is a presumption which is absolutely necessary for any defense of capitalism. Knowledge of value has to be spread equally or all of the promises of capitalism fall apart. Anyhow, if everyone DID know what the value of their work was and set their prices by that, the idea is that a market rate would establish itself, which certainly would happen. What we've got today however is employers telling everyone to set their rates by the 'market rate' and ignore any other drivers... which makes it very easy to drive down the price over time. That would be why the average salary of the lower 90% of the economy has only risen 1% in the past 30 years, even though worker productivity and corporate earnings have skyrocketed.
Cost-based prices are for gypsum and tile wax.
I know people who started out expecting, optimistically, to be able to charge (say) $120/hr, and who just a couple years later are shocked to discover that they're worth multiples of that.
Couple of things I'd change.
First ( probably me being dumb ) but for some reason I clicked on "Money per month" first rather than "amount". Maybe a dollar sign in the text box would help. Although I realize this has probably been done deliberately so it's currency agnostic.
I wasn't allowed to put in period characters, I tried to put in 37.5 hours ( standard week in the UK ) and it put that as 375 hours, which screwed the results just a little bit.
Another thing I got wrong was whether the amount I want per month is after tax, i.e. what I can spend.
as i've been getting top freelance devs on matchist, i've seen hourly rates range from $50/hr to $200/hr with the biggest indicators of higher rates being: self perceived value, years freelancing, and self perceived expertise of skillset.
we've made the conscious decision not to charge devs by hourly rate, but rather project milestone values.
Gentle plug: the site we're building, http://matchist.com is curated matching of projects for top freelance devs.
If i'm creating a solution that will save the client about 50k a year, i'd probably charge about 25k. To the client, thats a damn good deal, and if it takes me 3 months or less to build, its a damn good deal to me too.
I love the simplicity of this, it's definitely a lot easier than thinking about it myself.
My family all live in another country so I live on my own, after taking housing benefits in to account, I have £12 per month to myself (that's for food too, I eat a lot of noodles) - unfortunately, this is just a tradeoff I had to make in order to get myself working in this industry, everyone has to start somewhere.
I've been looking for a better paying job for the last couple of weeks and have some interviews, but to be honest, I figured most companies would jump at the chance of getting a 3 year PHP freelancer with a years experience with CodeIgniter, Joomla (1.5 and 2.5) integration and his own Google certified individual in Analytics and Adwords certificates.
Also, if you know anyone who is hiring in the north of England, please send me their email or url, might as well use HN to find jobs too as the "who's hiring" topic very rarely features PHP jobs in England.