Note that I give them a lot of credit for trying to stop and to have their own red lines about the use of their technology, and to stick to those red lines to the end.
Note that I give them a lot of credit for trying to stop and to have their own red lines about the use of their technology, and to stick to those red lines to the end.
People taking a good idea and extending it to do bad does harm twice: in the bad act itself and in making a good thing seem bad.
I am strongly against US starting wars and as you say blowing people up.
I am also strongly against the US being defenseless in the case of a national emergency.
What chance have the proverbial good-guys got if, even after _proving_ some modicum of good will, people will nonetheless condescend any attempt to influence bad/wildcard actors? It feels great to tell someone they 'should've known better' but I'm convinced that that's basically void of cautionary utility.
It's damned if you do and damned if you don't — lose-lose scenario either way.