Imagine Hamas are your government and want to figure out who's gay. You don't want a MITM in case they can do this.
Pick your definition of safe.
Pick your definition of safe.
Similarly in "traditional" media you may not want to discuss such private conversation on a radio broadcast. Perhaps you would rather discuss it on the phone or over snail mail as there is more of an expectation of privacy on those medium.
What does the "p" in "pm" stand for?
I will update above
The good thing about e2ee is that it probably makes the list of those with the ability to decrypt things encrypted e2e somewhat smaller. Fact is hacking can get to those keys. (i.e. state actor zero-click exploits your phone they are going to be able to get your private key and the messages in memory)
This is a thread arguing about what the law should be.
> Fact is hacking can get to those keys.
Everything made by humans is fallible.
Sure, they can fabricate some evidence and get access to your messages, in which case, valid point.