Show HN: Hush, an "incognito mode for Facebook"
hush.sh
hush.sh
Why go to such lengths to avoid being exploited by a service designed to exploit you? Just stop using it.
[1]: That is, apart from the login and pulling in your list of friends so as to populate your "Friends' feed", we don't use Facebook IDs or names at all.
Why would you want to have an anonymous conversation on facebook anyway? Sorry, don't get it.
For "rogue" friends, we have on our roadmap a mechanism to "flag" users for a review of their postings. That'd trigger an admin banning them if necessary.
The facebook component, is intended to be for a couple of things. Firstly, to allow you to restrict your discussion to just your friends (there are several scenarios in which you'd like their opinions, but you suspect they might not be completely honest with you if you knew who they were). Second, it allows us to be able to keep out bots en masse. The assumption being, of course, that Facebook polices its user-base to keep them out. In turn, the general quality of the discussions stays decent (well, for an anonymous platform, at least).
* It enables you to talk to your FB friends--a group whose opinion that you probably care about & respect--anonymously, so that they don't have to hold back or sugarcoat things.
* It enables us to ensure a reasonably decent quality on the service, by [hopefully] avoiding too many bots or trolls.
Am I wrong to assume that this ability might enable de-anonymization of postings after a server compromise?
In case of a complete server breach, that would indeed allow for de-anonymization of posts.
1) how many people would sign up without a facebook account? 2) how many of them could you "convert" and sign-in again with facebook? (saying something like "ok..now, how about you use your facebook account to [blabla] with your friends on facebook?
I'd say people are more willing to give it a try and see how it looks without passing facebook credentials first... That's just my hint..
Edit: Which has apparently worked.