Hacker News Reader

Comment by retlehs | Hacker News Reader

By visiting the account and noticing that it still has activity long after the report.

I'm confused. How do you know what account scraped your email address from github in order to send you an email?

Or do you mean going after the accounts of companies that make use of a likely scraped email address? That's not a bad idea either, but it has risks and isn't the same thing.

Half the time they literally say it in the email. I just looked in my spam folder and just a few hours ago got an email titled "Your profile: Github", that started with:

> I came across your profile on GitHub. Given you're based in the US, I thought it might be relevant to reach out. > > Profile: https://github.com/tedivm

They aren't doing anything to hide it.

But hold on.

They could have git cloned your repo, used or otherwise analyzed your code which follows TOS then used the local git repo to pull your email address.

How is GitHub responsible here?

They could have, but it seems unlikely they targeted one or two repos and probably cloned thousands or more.

That identifies the company that sent the email not the github account that scraped it

How do you propose GH take action without risking taking down legitimate projects due to brigades of false reports?

That they use some of their trillion dollar marketshare to solve it, why are you acting like this is a hard problem? It's not. They're just too cheap and greedy to do anything about it.

Trillion dollar marketshare? How big do you think GitHub is?

GitHub is wholly owned by Microsoft, which has a 3 trillion market cap

One would expect people on Hacker News to know that a single business division doesn't have direct access to the funds of other business divisions of the same corporation.

One would expect people on HN should know that companies subsidize failing BU all the time with their profitable BUs.

Sorry but why are you making excuses for these insanely greedy companies that don't want to hire people to solve a basic problem?

When I left, GH was valued at around $40 billion. Above the $8B they were purchased for. Well below $1T that is claimed

Even if they were valued around $100million they would still have more enough resources to solve this problem. Stop excusing companies that hate hiring people and are so greedy they would rather punt this problem to the commons fucking over an entire community that literally enabled them to exist.

Come on here, even Meta hires people in Kenya to look at CP and snuff films to label this stuff. Meta! They literally profited off of a genocide and they still know how to do this.

Excuse after excuse for these greedy companies.

How small do you think Microsoft is??!

GitHub is not all of Microsoft.

GH literally say in a parent comment:

> we can (and do) take action against those accounts including banning the accounts

Reply on news.ycombinator.com