Why this instead of giving my current setup access to the Atlassian MCP?
What do I lose by using another interface than the one I use for all my other agentic coding?
nit, project README should not be written in the first person
What do I lose by using another interface than the one I use for all my other agentic coding?
nit, project README should not be written in the first person
The goal isn’t to replace existing agent setups, but to explore whether the “boring majority” of tickets can be automated without manually going into the IDE, prompting, waiting for a result, opening a PR, waiting for a review of a second team-member. It is asynchronous by nature, and you just need to review it. I would argue that at some points agent would be so good that you would trust it to auto merge the result as well.
It’s still experimental, and part of the project is validating how reliable this approach can be in practice.
Re: README tone agreed. It was auto-generated. I’ll update it to be more neutral.
What you built is probably the equivalent of config and markdown in openclaw, do you think?