a 200 dollar a month customer isn't trying to get around paying for tokens, theyre trying to use the tooling they prefer. opencode is better in a lot of ways.
tokens get counted and put against usage limits anyway, unless theyre trying to eat analytics that are CC exclusive they should allow paying customers to consume to the usage limits in however way they want to use the models.
If openclaw chews my 200/month up in 15 days... I don't get more requests for free
Once again: you can use API keys and pricing to get UNLIMITED usage whenever you want. If you are choosing to pay for a subscription instead, it is because Anthropic is offering those subscriptions at a much better value-per-token. They are not offering such a subscription out of the goodness of their heart.
4 periods of weekly limits, is a monthly limit.
The point of the first half of my comment is that you cannot chew through your tokens in 15 days, because although the billing cycle is monthly, the limits are not.
I think I agree, but it's their business to run however they like. They have competition if we don't like it.
Anthropic is just a deeply "mis-dev-anthropic" company.
I use opencode everyday; can you explain how claudecode is much different and what it lacks?