Pixel 10a
store.google.com
store.google.com
I own a Pixel 9a. It's the first phone I used that made me question how many of the pixels going out of the camera app are actually coming the sensor and how many from some AI model.
Don't get me wrong. It will take front-cover magazine quality pics of that favorite turist hot spot, even in terrible light.
But as soon as there's something in the frame that your average insta influencer won't typically shoot the results are weird.
A green PCB on my workbench I want to document? Colors all wrong, can hardly pick out the traces. My 20 year Canon does a better job.
A black-and-white hand drawn charcoal portrait? The face on the jpeg will have tan skin and pinkish cheeks.
And there's no setting to turn this sort of processing off, unless you want to deal with the hassle of raw files.
This does not happen at all. Are you using the built in Camera app?
I just tried to take a picture of a black and white, outline only portrait right now and there is no added color.
On several separate occasions in my life drawing group I tried to take pictures of the drawings and they always came out tinted - not full color, but enough to look pretty weird if you know the original is in black-and-white. I also do remember that the viewfinder has shown a square around the face on the paper on those occasions, as if I was photographing a live person.
I mean, sure maybe I'm doing something wrong. But the app has pretty much zero settings. I checked I was in normal photo, not the portrait mode and that Ultra HDR was turned off.
And it's definitely some kind of a image post-processing step. Because the live viewfinder shows what I would expect. Then I press the shutter and the save photo is obviously different.
I'm not making this up. First time I've seen this I searched the web and found many threads on reddit and such discussing similar issues on Pixel phones.
One from the top of my browser history:
https://www.reddit.com/r/GooglePixel/comments/otsvv2/how_to_...
Here’s a comparison between the Pixel 10a and the Pixel 7: https://store.google.com/us/magazine/compare_pixel?hl=en-US&...
The one thing that wasn’t clear from the comparison was if USB display output is supported on the Pixel 10a. If it is, then I’m sold.
There are three reasons why I'd get this:
1. The trade-in value on the Pixel 7 is depreciating with time. Upgrading today should save more money vs. upgrading down the road.
2. It's on-par with Pixel 7 and significantly less expensive than the standard Pixel 10.
3. My goal is to replace the Pixel 7 with something that has USB-C display output so I can finally use my AR glasses with my phone.
All of these points are my initial impressions of the phone. Hopefully they turn out to be true of anyone who decides to go this route.
Ehh, I’m not sure about that. It depends what trend the resale value follows. Generally, if you’re upgrading every 3 years instead of every 6 years, you’re going to be spending twice as much on new phones, but it’s not always the case that you’re getting twice as much resale value.
Here the Pixel 10 and 10a are exactly the same price (both 549):
https://tweakers.net/pricewatch/zoeken/?keyword=pixel+10
Of course, the Pixel 10 is 6 months into its cycle and heavily discounted. The Pixel 10a does not differ much from the 9a (due to keeping the same SoC, same amount of RAM, etc), and is only 369 Euro (with a low of 338).
tl;dr Pixel 9a and Pixel 10 are the good deals now, at least in Europe.
Unless I'm missing something, 9a→10a seems even more incremental than 8a→9a was. The price reduction is the most interesting thing about the 10a to me; if that ends up being permanent (instead of just a pre-order promotion), then once GrapheneOS support lands I could see this being handy with a prepaid SIM as a burner phone for international travel or music festivals or attending/documenting protests or something else where if it gets lost or stolen or confiscated as “evidence” or whatever then it wouldn't hurt quite as bad if I never saw it again. Otherwise, at the “normal” $499 pricetag I'm struggling to see much of a point v. its predecessor (or even its predecessor's predecessor).
Pixel 9a and pixel 10 are the good options right now.
But it's a pity that they've stopped making them smaller than the base model. I believe that ended with the 7/7a and, in this case, the 10a is actually 1 mm taller and wider than the 10, and 0.4 mm deeper. Hardly noticeable, but I'd still rather they produced a more compact variant.
then I upgraded to a 6a - overheating, battery exploded - google refused to change it coz it was bought in the uk - while I'm now in the US - as if I didn't trade my US bought 3a for a pixel 6a in the UK - some android version brought 2 photo apps - so I recovered some via the cloud - lost others
finally gave up and moved back to using an iPhone - transition was easy - I recovered everything that was left intact on my iPhone SE before switching to a Pixel 3a
so yeah f*k google phones
Funny to see that on their marketing page. The fact that they decided to drop support for the pixel 3a ~3 years after its release was fucked up. One of the reasons I stopped buying android devices.
Also, Pixel devices are very well supported by third-party ROMs after EOL: https://xdaforums.com/f/google-pixel-3a-roms-kernels-recover...
(also, I just noticed that out of all my comments, my OP was controversial enough to be downvoted <0. That's kind of funny, I thought there were better contenders.)
… then they killed the Pixel Pass at month 22.
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/08/google-kills-two-yea...
It was my last android phone