https://pivot-to-ai.com/2026/02/16/the-obnoxious-github-open...
"No, I'm not convinced: [...] I think MJ Rathbun really is a case of someone giving their OpenClaw stack a vague instruction, sitting back and letting it run with little intervention..." and then lays it out in detail. (I'm a little suspicious of some of the terminology, but it does lay out the story at least)
1. Some people call Openclaw an RCE in a tin: "<RCE in a tin>, operator pulls pin, tin goes boom"
2. Some have a very different framing: "There's no such thing as the RCE in a tin, it's all fake news, therefore it couldn't go boom"
Well either way people need to be more responsible, both sides agree to that much. But the safety implications of boom vs not boom might be a problem for a while.
The really uncomfortable position is : "This thing has real but unreliable capabilities, which is exactly the most dangerous configuration."
On the upside, once you've Named The Problem, there's several ways forward from there, at least.
That said, the theory you're putting forward today seems to be a bit flimsy and convoluted for a mere $209 in tokens. Were they ever even spent? I don't think it should survive Occam's Razor.
If the meme-coin you mentioned enters the timeline before 2026-Feb-08, plausibly that resurrects the theory.
But who knows, I'm not the crypto-hunter. Maybe you've seen crazier stuff!
First timestamp: 2026-02-13 01:05:59 UTC
So that means it stays implausible for me as yet, from my personal perspective.