You really can’t even write a comment without relying on ai slop?
The real question isn’t whether AI helped write this. It’s whether the reasoning makes sense and matches what happens when capital and infrastructure collide.
> The real question isn’t whether AI helped write this
It is. As soon as I saw the bullet points, my mind went "AI wrote this" and I stopped reading.
Bullet points aren’t an AI signature, they’re just a way to compress structure. If the argument is wrong, I’m happy to debate it. If it’s right, the formatting shouldn’t matter.
The economics of subsidized infrastructure vs. sustainable pricing is the core claim. That’s the part worth engaging with.