Memory. I have built up so many scripts and crons and integrated little programs and memories with open claw it would be difficult to migrate to some other system.
System of record and all.
System of record and all.
Using openrouter+kilocode I can simply switch between different providers' models and not miss out on anything.
I continue to find it amusing that people really think corporates are really holding power. No - they are holding power granted to them by the government of the state.
Remind me why Zuck et al had to kiss the ring.
If lobbying was illegal then you might have a point here, but alas.
Perhaps the competitive moat of the future will be time critical access to data. Google likely gets new data faster than everyone else, and they could use this time arbitrage in products like news, finance, research, etc.
This is a perfect use case for a new agent to query the old agent and get the details.
You could have OpenClaw summarize and export them into a format that the new one wants.
Maybe the new agents will be designed to be compatible with OpenClaw's style.
There is no reason to believe that you're locked in to something.
The new agents might have a feature to query your old agents for a migration.
That said, I find it really hard to believe that you've generated so much work in the past few weeks since OpenClaw launched that you could never migrate to something else. It hasn't been that long.
Heck, that was half the pitch behind Obsidian, even if the project someday ended, markdown would remain. And switching between Obsidian and e.g. Logseq shows the ease of doing so.
The irony of systems of record is that if there is more than one, there are effectively none. Just data stuck in silos waiting for compute.