The story seemed lime an ad-hoc mix of the ideas of Charles Stross, Ray Bradbury, and edited by the rambling and incoherent Steve Gilmore
The story seemed lime an ad-hoc mix of the ideas of Charles Stross, Ray Bradbury, and edited by the rambling and incoherent Steve Gilmore
Therefore, if it's difficult to put oneself in the minds of the characters of the story, "that's not a bug, it's a feature".
Also, we are supposed to imagine that the people in the story are smarter and more disciplined thinkers than we are.
Therefore, if the characters reach quickly conclusions that we would agonize over for longer, that again may be a feature rather than a bug. (It depends on how good their reasoning actually turns out to be.)
The story probably does (as it stands) assume too much acquaintance with the ideas Eliezer's been talking about on the "Overcoming Bias" blog; but then, that's where it was posted.
A central point of the series is to discuss the validity of imposing one's moral standards on others that share little or no background with you.
A central point of the series is to discuss the validity of imposing one's moral standards on others with little or no shared background.
What a shame.