Having equity in some company that makes and sells voting machines does not prove a vast conspiracy of voter fraud.
I mean, if this were true Romney would win. What's the point of rigging machines if you can't swing the swing states in your favor?
I mean, if this were true Romney would win. What's the point of rigging machines if you can't swing the swing states in your favor?
The way I see it: It's effectively illegal to prove the machines are fraudulent as they are proprietary machines and are closed source. So, given that they are run by partisan companies and we have absolutely no method of verifying their inner workings:
Don't we have to assume that the machines can't be trusted?
A strong paper trail seems to be the answer. It doesn't matter what the hardware and software tries to do if the machine has to produce a paper record (checked and approved by each voter) that is spooled for later checking against the electronic total.