Coffee and Tea Intake, Dementia Risk, and Cognitive Function
jamanetwork.com
jamanetwork.com
A recreational stimulant often taking in social settings seems to hit a lot of those.
The interesting one is blood pressure. Caffeine would spike it, but I have long wondered if "exercising" the vasculature with transients is a good idea and long-term elevation is the real killer. Like school fire drills.
PS: Don’t trust in “no conflict of interest” claims
That's a very big difference.
Incidently, People who study or do a lot of thinking heavy deep work also tend to be coffee addicts. coincidence?
Coffee can be quite expensive, and thinking work that requires a lot of education tends to correlate with higher income, so I wonder if coffee drinking just acted as another wealth indicator.
Good coffee can be expensive, I agree with that.
The positive effect may be negated by hypertension induced by said stimulants, which would then lead to organic dementias.
There was a study in 2021 that found that drinking more than six cups of coffee a day was associated with a 53% increased risk of dementia and smaller total brain volume.
https://cardiologycoffee.com/blogs/news/new-study-says-coffe...
- There's a sharp decrease in incidence between 2.5 drinks/day and 4.5 (3rd/4th quartile)
- Technically decaffeinated coffee actually had more dementia cases in the NHS cohort
- The highest decaf group is 1 drinks/day
- They didn't track the kinds of tea people were drinking (black, green, herbal)
- Drinking one cup of tea seems nearly as effective as 2.5 cups of coffee.
while it seems they were controlling for caffeine intake the tea vs coffee groups would have had wildly different intake with similar results.
also I couldn't tell if they tracked if the people drinking 40oz of coffee a day simply dropped dead before they could go crazy
Needs an obligatory mention
So
being King << drinking Tea < drinking Coffee
Weird, tea is supposed to have half the caffeine of coffee.
The decaffeination process also removes more parts than just the caffeine.
I guess I'm not really concerned about three cups of coffee in that case.
*calorie expenditure
If that is correct, why?
I thought higher calorie intake leads to weight gain which increases diabetes risk.
> "2 to 3 Cups of Coffee a Day May Reduce Dementia Risk. But Not if It’s Decaf." - NYT
> "Daily cups of caffeinated coffee or mugs of tea may lower dementia risk." - Science News
"Reduce," "Lower" - this is all causal language for a study that is purely observational. The authors do a good job keeping causal language out of the paper, so why can't media do the same?
This leads to an environment where everyone knows that "correlation != causation," but almost nobody understands why.