Idk what the median lifespan of a piece of code / project / employee tenure is but probably way less than 10 years, which makes that "long term investment" pretty pointless in most cases.
Successful projects: quite often much longer than 10 years
Code quality doesn't matter until lots of people start using what you wrote and you need to maintain/extend/change it
God it's a depressing thought that whatever work you do is just a throwaway no-one will use. That shouldn't be your end goal
I didn't say that.
In fact if your code doesn't significantly change over time it probably means your project wasn't successful.
That's one of the biggest benefits of software quality and the long-term investment: how easy is your thing to change?
If anything I'd claim using LLMs can actually free up your time to really focus on the proper design of the software.
I think the disconnect here is that people bashing LLMs don't understand that any decent engineer isn't just going around vibe coding, but instead creating a well thought design (with or without AI) and using LLMs to speed up the implementation.