Why should anyone take your sensible first statement seriously if your second statement is so easily verifiably false?
Some of these AI critical posts really are an exercise in Gell Mann Amnesia, man.
Some of these AI critical posts really are an exercise in Gell Mann Amnesia, man.
Where are the results, tell me? What insanely great products have been shipped by people leveraging/building on top of LLMs...?
Yeah, silence. As usual.
Meanwhile this story just came out: https://newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/claude-code-is-the-inf...
I'm sure they'll all lying though, right?
Or, because it hasn't solved all of the world's problems yet then I guess it doesn't count?
Maybe you're the one overhyping AI.
AI helps me too, and I feel like I ship more now. But what if it's just a feeling and I'm not doing anything groundbreaking? What if I'm just doing what I've always done but at slighly more speed?
This is exactly the overhyping the critics are continuing to strawman their complaints with.
Speaking for myself, I think AI is better than the average dev. And yes I think it is affecting hiring.
But this is very different from saying I think it will do new things that weren't possible yesterday.