Hacker News Reader

Comment by ClarityJones | Hacker News Reader

How should readers assess the credibility of these claims that 12k, 36k, or 100k have been killed? I'm not there. I haven't seen anything with my own eyes. Should I expect that if the death toll reaches X, then Y form of evidence would make it out?

View on HN

Personally, I believe the concern and outrage is warranted even if the death toll is indeed only (!) the 3,000 claimed by Iranian state media. That is the most conservative number so far and it is still an almost unimaginable number in such a short period of time.

It's not unimaginable at all. There are over 1200 cities in Iran, 400+ which saw active protests. If say, 'just' 50 were killed in each on average, that very quickly adds up to the tens of thousands. And looking at the footage coming out and the widespread news of overflowing morgues throughout the country, it's not unbelievable at all.

When people imagine mass casualty events, they imagine something like Verdun or Hiroshima, where tens of thousands are killed within a relatively concentrated geographic radius. But more often than not, they actually occur across a wider area in numerous but smaller casualty increments which add up to something much bigger. And when considering how deadly even a single well-positioned gunman with an automatic rifle can be against a crowd of unarmed and tightly packed civilians, it's really not surprising to see how easily casualties could have mounted, especially when you multiple that over 400+ cities.

Credible reporting puts the number somewhere between 30-40k among the intelligence community - comments and discussions have happened in public, and various officials around the world have repeated that range several times over the last week or so.

The information and sources are there for you to search, and it's up to you to determine who you find credible and why.

> Credible reporting puts the number somewhere between 30-40k among the intelligence community

The same intelligence community bragging that they're embedded among the protestors and engaging in covert-action (oxymoronic as it sounds) to bring about regime change?

https://archive.is/20251230221603/https://www.jpost.com/midd...

https://x.com/mikepompeo/status/2007180411638620659 https://x.com/mikepompeo/status/2007180411638620659

Pompeo showing some impressive vicarious cosplay here.

Iranian Ministry of Health officials have put the number at ~30k. So I would take that as a likely lower bound.

https://archive.ph/2026.01.25-142822/https://time.com/735763...

This is not an official count. It's some officials speaking through anonymity with their own personal estimates

*purported officials

I am very skeptical tbh seeing all this unfold. The propaganda push from media over this is off the charts on this.

A counter-perspective on these figures and their sources :

https://x.com/TheGrayzoneNews/status/2017089536686211440#m https://xcancel.com/TheGrayzoneNews/status/20170895366862114...

The Grayzone is also a propaganda outlet, for the other side: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grayzone

The article contradicts what you said. It cites "two [unnamed] senior officials" and then goes on to say:

> The 30,000 figure is also far beyond tallies being compiled by activists methodically assigning names to the dead.

The official government estimate is still 3,117 btw.

The truth is we'll likely never know for sure the real number and any outlet reporting anything else without qualifications is being dishonest.

>Iranian Ministry of Health officials have put the number at ~30k.

Iran official figures put it around ~3k actually.

https://x.com/araghchi/status/2014688298472460563

That was 4 days before the link I posted.

That said it's been pointed out to me that my link is statements by anonymous government officials, which is not the same thing as "official Iranian government numbers".

They have almost no credibility.

Gazan health authorities were releasing the names of their dead, and this was met with great skepticism and qualification in Israel and the West (until this week when Israel just accepted at least tens of thousands died).

Random, inflated numbers from anonymous sources pop up on Iran and they're instantly quoted as fact.

Also - some of the rebels have guns and have been using them, so some of these dead are from shootouts.

> "Random, anonymous sources"

Time Magazine is reporting[0] that local Iranian health officials have given that number.

[0]: https://time.com/7357635/more-than-30000-killed-in-iran-say-...

Did you miss the part where they were not able to verify any of these claims?

I think, as sad as it sounds, the exact number doesn’t really matter.

We know: We know: a government whose sole purpose is to protect its people has committed the mass murder of unarmed civilians. has committed the mass murder of unarmed civilians.

That’s all there is to know to make a judgement about what has happened.

> a government whose sole purpose is to protect its people

I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a statement.

Asking questions usually helps to alleviate confusion.

What is it exactly you’re confused about?

What government can you actually point to - not theoretical, but actually existing - which holds as its sole purpose the safety of all its people?

Isn’t that like everything else in life? We set very high standards and then measure people against them.

Which boss is perfect? Which dad is? Nothing and no one is.

But there are shades. Some are way closer to the bar than others.

I can list hundreds of governments that have not reacted to mass protests by killing unarmed civilians (their own people) by the thousand.

If you want to have a philosophical discussion about whether that is really the "sole purpose of government", then I suppose we could have one, though frankly my interest in that isn't all that high.

That's a long way from asserting that it is, in fact, the sole purpose of government, which was what I objected to.

It’s a bit odd how fast the discussion moves away from what actually happened and onto nitpicking the wording used to criticize it.

Even if you drop the word “sole” entirely, the basic expectation is still that a government does not kill unarmed civilians.

At that point, it is fair to wonder whether the objection adds any clarity, or just pulls attention away from the judgment itself.

I find the numbers to be surreal. The Gaza war is estimated to have around 100.000 dead (if you also count those who were buried under collapsed buildings or died of indirect causes). That was after two years of bombardment.

This here is the same death toll in two days.

Their own people too

The Gaza war is a war with the side with the superior army trying to avoid killing. In Iran's war on it's own people, the superior army is trying to kill "as a punishment" (their words).

The same is true for the Russia-Ukraine war, btw. There have been 1300 victims per day for over 3 years. Russia is not trying to minimize casualties.

Why is it surprising that it results in an extreme difference in death toll? Or at least, in the rate of killing.

Yes, but 1300 victims per day, which is absolutely horrible, but still less than 6000 - 50.000 victims per day.

Or as another point of comparison (according to Wikipedia) : The bombing of Dresden went over three days and cost 25.000 lives. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki actually resulted in 100.000 immediate deaths.

All those locations - the Donbas, Gaza, Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were complete wastelands afterwards.

This makes it hard to believe for me. That being said, 3000 would still be absolutely gruesome.

I think in Russia's case it's a matter of practicality. It's not like every day they have an average number of dead and there certainly have been days with far more than 1000 victims per day, they have at least reached 5000 in a single day. I bet fighting around Kyiv got the rate much higher 3 years back too. Ukraine and Russia are not fighting in dense cities like Teheran, but in small rural villages mostly, and a lot of the time in fields, in treelines. Tough to kill many people there.

Iranian Islamic guard was slaughtering people in dense crowds in the middle of skyscrapers. That certainly makes those numbers realistic to me.

I don't know but the videos coming out are horrific. I don't understand how the Gaza crowd is supporting the Iranian regime/trying to bury this after they just fought so hard to get the Gazan's suffering seen/heard.

Who's supporting it?

I stopped collecting specific examples because it does no good (people asking your question previously weren't really asking in good faith) but jumping back to the last time I was:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46611046

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46605598

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46596836

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46611065

SyrianGirl and others in the same space on X (way way more that's just the first off the top of my head). Lots in comments on BlueSky labeling it all a zionist plot. Lots in comments Reddit labeling it all a zionist plot.

Discussion in major media about the phenomenom https://www.abc.net.au/religion/milad-haghani-iran-palestine...

Example from a recent pro-Palestinian event: https://kagi.com/search?q=Pro-Khamenei+banners++London+Jan+3...

Not seeing any support behind your links?

OK sure.

Example from a recent protest: https://kagi.com/search?q=Pro-Khamenei+banners++London+Jan+3...

Taken from my above links: sporkxrocket 26 days ago | parent | context | on: Iran Protest Map

I understand the Middle East and know that Iran is our ally in the fight against Zionism. I also understand that these "protests" are inorganic and have failed in their attempt to inflict damage on Iran."

Doesn't seem that supportive to me and did you really just try to cite paywalled Kagi?

Direct comments on this site saying this is all just Israel and illegitimate is somehow 'not supportive'? Saying they support the Iranian regime. In what world are those comments not supporting the Iranian regime like I claimed?

I changed the search to Google since you couldn't.

https://www.google.com/search?q=Pro-Khamenei+banners+London+...

First search I did pulled up this recent Palestinian march with support for the Iranian regime. I guess that's also not being supportive of the Iranian regime in your mind?

I refer back to my 'people asking for this here don't seem to be in good faith'. I'm assuming you are just a troll at this point and I'm moving on.

Do people support things they call illegitimate?

>SyrianGirl and others in the same space on X

I think those spread Russian propaganda. I can see why the Russian dictatorship would want people rising up against dictators shot but it's not representative of general support for palestinians.

(Wikipedia on SyrianGirl https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maram_Susli)

She was highly retweeted during the biggest Gaza discussion days. But no true Scotsman I guess. That's just one example off the top of my head. Again I'm not chasing down all the social media. Go read comments under the released videos coming out of Iran. Go read the comments under anti-regime Iranians pleas. Go google the Palestinian protests for people holding up signs supporting Iran, like the example I gave.

I feel I gave plenty of examples, from actual support at actual protests up to a major western newspaper talking about how people react, to specific people doing exactly what I said here. If that isn't enough you are intentionally being blind to it.

You honestly cannot know and anyone who claims you can should be suspected. It's probably between what the government claims (which will tend to be lower) and what people estimate. Some groups are only logging confirmed deaths are around 12k+ probably increasing by the day.

But if it's 5-10-20 or even more k, how much difference does it make? The crime of mass killing and collective punishment is still as gruesome either way

> I haven't seen anything with my own eyes.

Do you mean in person?

Iranian official figures[1] put the final death toll at ~3111 for the entire duration of the protests (about a month). They have supposedly published names and identification numbers for about ~2900. So that gives a baseline at least.

Figures thrown around like 12k/20k/30k in 2 days - frankly beggar belief. Compare it to the recent (and ongoing) massacre of Gaza. which at its peak we were talking 1000-2000 deaths per day. The Israelis were dropping 2000-pound bombs and shelling non-stop until the entire strip into rubble. Reaching similar numbers against armed protestors without resorting to heavy weapons doesn't seem plausible. On top of it, 100s of thousands of injured (claimed along with the deaths). Again in 2 days. Even in a country of 90 million, can you imagine the utter pandemonium in every hospital. Mass graves. The blood and bodies at the squares. It would be visible from space. It would impossible to conceal. You have to go to Babi Yar in WW2 to get similar figures.

Beyond that its hard for me to tell. I dont trust any of this, given the interests and parties involved and the sources pushing these narratives . The legacy media is in full-blown propaganda offensive. The accounts and claims seem to come from a constellation of anti-regime NGOs, activists, Israeli lobbyists, neocons and intelligence agencies. Statements and actions of western and Israeli leaders make it abundantly clear this is an armed regime-change operation backed by numerous US, Israeli and western-backed proxy groups. US carrier strike groups have finally arrived in Gulf of Oman and suddenly the news stories pick up again. A month ago the same CSG was off the coast of Venezuela while the nobel prize was being awarded to an opponent of the Venezuelan government. Now that same nobel-laureate is meeting up with Reza Pahlavi and opponents of the Iranian government while Trump is sabre-rattling again. It all feels like deja-vu all over again. Netanyahu and the Israelis really want their Iran war and they need the Americans to carry it home for them.

https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/02/01/763331/Iran-officia...

Reply on news.ycombinator.com