Grok is a platform that is enabling this en masse. If xAI can't bring in guardrails or limit who can access these capabilities, then they deserve what's coming to them.
Arguably morally reprehensible but it has not always been illegal (and still isn't in many places) if you're talking about images of adults.
This comment chain isn't about a difference of opinion, but a difference in morality - there's no debating possible about morals I think.
Who told you that? Go ask Pamela Anderson or Paris Hilton about that one. There are rules about material created without consent, but people do not retain a perpetual right to have formerly consentual material taken down. Hollywood, let alone the porn industry, would collapse overnight if every disgruntled star could have movies removed whenever they feel like it simply by withdrawing "consent" years after creation.
And for copyright, generally the person on camera is not holding the camera and so is not the creator/owner of the material. That is a regular issue where people attempt to use the dmca to remove images of themselves from websites.
She can't withdraw consent when she never gave it in the first place.
She claimes, later, to have not consented but given the sophistication of the production no reasonable person could believe she had no idea it was being filmed. She might not consent to the exact public release but she was certainly well aware of being filmed on the day. She consented to the creation.
Same issue decades later during the iphone hacks/leaks. They did not consent to public release, but did consent to creation and private distribution, sometimes even taking and initially sharing the photos themselves.
Let's start from the beginning, create and own:
You're sketching out some nude fanart on a piece of paper. You created that and own that. Thas has always been illegal?!
(This is apart from my feelings on Mechahitler/Grok, which aren't positive.)
Is twitter a piece of paper in your desk? No, it's not.
OP had "It has always been illegal and morally reprehensible to create, own, distribute or store "
It would make more sense then to instead say:
"It has always been illegal and morally reprehensible to distribute "
I am with you on publishing these...
Personally I think it's just embarrassing, not immoral.
What if I only thought about it? Still morally reprehensible? Or only if I tell others I think about them? Then you could argue it's sexual harassment.