Hmm...
TypeScript: Microsoft
Rust: Mozilla
Go: Google
Java: Oracle
By your logic we should be programming in Common Lisp.
==========
Edit:
- Rust: Mozilla
+ Rust: Rust FoundationHmm...
TypeScript: Microsoft
Rust: Mozilla
Go: Google
Java: Oracle
By your logic we should be programming in Common Lisp.
==========
Edit:
- Rust: Mozilla
+ Rust: Rust FoundationYou left out an important part of the GP's comment.
>By your logic we should be programming in Common Lisp.
I wish. (Scheme is acceptable too)
I believe firmly that there should be a single true value, which we might reasonably name true, and a single false value, false, other values aren't booleans, so it's no more reasonable to ask whether an empty string is false, than to just forget to close the quote marks on a string. What we wrote isn't a correct program.
The others (Scheme, Clojure, etc.) are just Lispy syntax but lack the true "soul" of Lisp-style development.
The only real drawback to common lisp is the fact that the library ecosystem is practically non-existent.
Nope. Not anymore, several years maybe?
Python: The Python Software Foundation
Turns out two of the best languages don't need corporate overlords to steer their development.
Alot of its current popularity is becasue big companies developed the libraries that make up the foundation of Ai with it.