Hacker News Reader

HNHacker News

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

Comment by heraldgeezer | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

heraldgeezer·

You people are so cynical.

Its simply made for 911 calls.

In the 2G era there was no compute space to just put in extra evil shit for fun

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_resource_location_servic...

View on HN

This line of argument is common. We use the term 'wiretap' because that is what it was, a physical tap on a physical wire and it took a real person there to do it. Even then it took a warrant to approve it. Wiretap laws were written when the technology made abuse extremely hard and were likely appropriate for the time. Now we live in an age where abuse of millions can be done in a single key-stroke and often doesn't require a warrant or oversight of any kind because the technology has changed and evolved to provide loopholes around the laws. The intent was emergency services but the mass use has been anything but. That is the key point and those that have abused this, weather on behalf of the government or for corporate profit, should be held responsible. We should have laws that criminalize breaking the intent of use in ways that harm individuals. You found a technical system rife for abuse and you use it that way? Go to jail. Pay a fine. It is that simple.

Made for, and used for, are two different things. The article gives an example of Israel slurping down that data constantly to track everyone, and you can bet they aren't the only ones doing that.

Why is it always about Israel?

> In the 2G era [...]

...you could just listen to calls in the clear. Pager traffic was completely unencrypted as well.

GSM is encrypted.

Well, "encrypted", sure.

In the same way that a Yale lock on your door means it's locked and secure, until someone comes along with two thin flattish bits of springy metal.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com