First question - CBP, as noted.
Unlimited jurisdictional limits - and the courts will enforce this with whose army? As it were.
ICE isn’t allowed to act on citizens either, and yet here we are.
Unlimited jurisdictional limits - and the courts will enforce this with whose army? As it were.
ICE isn’t allowed to act on citizens either, and yet here we are.
Did you know ICE can arrest you for harboring illegal aliens?
Because 1) while they are legally allowed to do it, it isn’t their job, and 2) it is other people’s jobs.
Which is the point.
By law or policy?
The question you asked, as pointed out, is a non sequitor given the reality of what’s going on.
Not what non sequitur means nor how it’s spelled. And repeating a point in the same comment doesn’t count as pointing it out previously.
To the extent there is non sequitur in this thread, it’s in jumping into a legal discussion halfway to argue the law doesn’t actually matter because you feel like it.