Fair points :). The naming is 'evolutionary' — started as 'semantic diff' because it analyzes meaning not just lines, but 'commit review' is more accurate for what it does now. You're right about the redundancy — same issue appearing in 3 sections is noise. Adding output config (sections to include, verbosity level) is on the list. The 'why was this deleted' questions — yeah, the tool can't answer, but surfacing the question for the reviewer has value. At least you know to ask the author. Good callout on dependabot. Worth reconsidering. Thanks for actually trying it and giving specific feedback.