Because my point is how messed up the VC incentive structure for tech is. This is proved by comparing it to every other industry.
> Yes, they do actually. I'm not sure why you think those links are talking about investments when they very clearly are about revenue.
They are using the word "revenue", but can you be certain that the word means "revenue from product sales"? Or does it just mean "revenue from investment".
A couple of the articles specifically mentioned the series A rounds as part of "revenue generation". And my whole point was that investors celebrating how much faster they're investing in AI startups is a classic "begging the question" type fallacy. They are measuring themselves on how much money they are investing in startups, and then saying that is proof that the startups are valuable.