Non sequitor.
You don't have to be bad at coding to use LLMs. The argument was specifically about thinking that LLMS can be great at accomplishing complex tasks (which they are not)
You don't have to be bad at coding to use LLMs. The argument was specifically about thinking that LLMS can be great at accomplishing complex tasks (which they are not)
Great programmers wouldn't support or back AI if it couldn't handle complex tasks. AI can handle complex tasks inconsistently when operating on it's own. They can handle complex tasks consistently when pair programming with a human operator.
The simple case is that if you ask an agent to do a whole bunch of modifications across a large number of files, it often loses context due to context windows.
Now, you can make your own agents with custom mcp servers to basically improve its ability to do tasks, but then you are basically just building automation tools in the first place.
I can certainly see how you're better than every one of those people and how to you what they call "complex" is just simplistic. I've never met anyone great like you.