Hacker News Reader

HNHacker News

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

Comment by didgetmaster | Hacker News Reader

Full thread

didgetmaster·

This is why I rarely join those 'customer loyalty' programs that almost every store offers.

I say 'no thanks' when the cashier wants to know my phone number, even if I am paying cash.

It is almost impossible to remain anonymous in the consumer space, even if you are really trying.

View on HN

Being anonymous is actually pretty expensive. The loyalty program is a price discrimination mechanism: going through the trouble of clicking through coupons, discovering deals, signals that you have a higher price sensitivity. The default of taking no action signals a higher willingness to pay. Also, by paying cash, you're subsidizing the card users, some of whom get a bit of that back.

i am paying for my privacy. or, i am refusing to sell out my privacy for any amount of money. and i disagree that it is expensive. the difference can't be more than 10-20%. that's worth it for me.

It's not clear you're actually buying any privacy. The cameras they have in stores will be used for tracking customers soon anyway, and not having a tracking identifier associated with your transactions make you stick out like a sore thumb.

camera tracking is illegal in many places, and while my shopping may stick out, it still can't easily be tied to my identity. i only pay with cash too. the only place where i use cards is on ATMs.

the only place i have one is a grocery store where their loyalty program price is listed on the shelf tag and is lower, often by quite a bit (a third to half off is common). even then, i use one of the meme phone numbers (local area code + 867-5309, 678-999-8212, 281-330-8004, etc.).

The day I learned of ghost Facebook profiles, I realized fighting back was impossible.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com