This review [1] cites the absolute highest amount of emitted styrene in the studies they are reviewing to be 113 μg/min. Using [2] for simplicity with styrene's molar mass (104.15 g/mol), we get to a printer creating at most 0.024 ppm of styrene per minute per m3 of unchanged air. For comparison, the "work exposure limit (WEL) for styrene is currently 100 parts per million (ppm) averaged over an 8-hour day" [4].
In other words, as long as you have some air exchange in the room, you'd be orders of magnitude away from the safe work exposure limit on styrene.
It also makes sense, considering that it's a microscopic amount of molten plastic, whereas injection moulding factories work with vats of the stuff.
[1]: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135223102...
[2]: https://teesing.com/en/tools/ppm-mg3-converter
A lot of plastics contain wide assortments of additives to obtain mechanical properties. Outdoor ventilation is absolutely preferable to filtration or smell reduction filters that does practically nothing about carcinogens.
PLA is comparatively low emission, but a slow cooking PTFE tube in many hot-ends is not something people should be around. ymmv =3
Chopped CF filled FDM filaments are mostly a scam, but there are few PETG and ASA viable options:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7JperqVfXI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7JAOi4JnBs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAL_p0yYKIc (Fibre Seeker 3)
One challenge designing a metal-printing process was making it safe for people without prior lab-safety training. Some 3D additive processes are simply just not practical for careless "yolo" consumers. =3
People focus too much on smell as the only indicator.