Hacker News Reader

If these are so easy to identify, why not just incorporate some kind of screening into the early stages of peer review?

What makes you believe that are easy to identify?

One could require DOIs for each reference. That's both realistic to achieve and easy to verify.

Although then why not just cite existing papers for bogus reasons?

Isn't that what GPTZero does?

Because real work takes time and effort, and there is no real incentive for it here.