Bullshit asymmetry by way of impulsive LLM slop strikes again.
Every new readme, announcement post, and codebase is tailored to achieve maximum bloviation.
No substance, no credibility———just vibes.
Every new readme, announcement post, and codebase is tailored to achieve maximum bloviation.
No substance, no credibility———just vibes.
I haven't read the reddit thread or anything but If the author coded it by hand or is passionate about this project, he will probably understand what we are talking about.
But I don't believe its such a big deal to have a benchmark be written by AI though? no?
Thank you for volunteering. I look forward to your results.
Sure can you wait a few weeks tho? I know nothing about benchmarking so gonna learn it first and I have a few tests to prepare for irl.
I do feel like someone else more passionate about the project should try to pick the benchmarking though.
I don't mind benchmarking it but I only know tools like hyper for benchmarks & I have played with my fair share of zip archives and their random access retrieval but I feel like even that would depend from source to source.
There are some experienced people in here who are really cool at what they do, I just wanted to say that if someone's interested and already has the Domain Specific knowledge to benchmark & they enjoy it in the first place, this having AI benchmark shouldn't be much of a problem in comparison.
For example: https://old.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/1qi64pr/i_got_i...