Hacker News Reader

95% of what is posted on the Internet is placed with intent to harm?

What?

If you consider Advertisement and News (with understanding that it is rarely unbiased) harmful, the 95% is not that far off the truth.

Mandatory adblock for children is something I could support.

> Mandatory adblock for children is something I could support.

And adults.

And you think their internet was to harm?

I'd argue the overwhelming majority was agnostic at best to harm being a factor.