In this thread we get to see which usernames display an inability to detect very obvious satire.
If it has been mass maintained by some random person in Nebraska since 2003, that is battle-tested infrastructure.
... Or conclude that the message is contradictory such that it's basically just trolling?
The author seems to be so deep in the radioactive weeds that even if it is satire and they're distancing themself from it, they're still likely to already have experienced a near-lethal dose.
Worded differently, I would argue that anyone who sees this and _understands it_ is stuck in something very unhealthy and needs to get out very fast. Using this level of satire as a coping mechanism just prolongs what shouldn't be prolonged (or exist in the first place).