Nonsense
There will however be a gigantic gulf between kids who use AI to learn vs those who use AI to aid learning
Objective review of Alpha school in Austin:
There will however be a gigantic gulf between kids who use AI to learn vs those who use AI to aid learning
Objective review of Alpha school in Austin:
yeah, but not the way you are thinking
you think the rich are going to abolish a traditional education for their kids and dump them in front of a prompt text box for 8 years
that'll just be for the poor and (formerly) middle-class kids
Rather than 1 teacher for 30 students, 1 teacher can scale to 30 students to better address Bloom's 2 sigma problem, which discovered students in a 1:2 ratio with a tutor full time ended up in the 98% of students reliably.
LLMs are capable of delivering this outright, or providing serious inroads to it for those capable and willing to do the work beyond going through the motions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom's_2_sigma_problem (1984)
I remember when I was at the uni, the topics I learned the best were the ones I put effort to study by myself at home. Having a tutor with me all the time will actually make me do the bare minimum as there always were other things to do and I would love to skip the hard parts and move forward.
If you read the article the other post shared, I think you might be surprised to find it's exactly what you are describing.
I don't disagree with your premise, but I don't think that article backs it up at all.