From CBC:
> Current estimates are that it would cost five to 10 times more to distribute electricity to a big city via underground cables, and that not all of nature's problems would be alleviated even if that were done.
How does that compare to building above ground towers to support cable weight in all conditions?
I'd assume / guesstimate that route planning, community advisement, actual cable length, etc. costs are more or less the same in either case.
Underground power lines are expensive, but not that expensive. As far as I know, you dig a ditch, put the power line into it, and then put the material back in over the top.
Why would you drill?
Trenching is straightforward, I mention horizontal directional drilling as that puts a cap on the total cost of going underground Vs pylons and above ground stringing.