Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by rottencupcakes | Hacker News Reader

Full thread

rottencupcakes

Odd how nobody ever builds a balloon to fly towards the communist utopias.

View on HN

One guy did use a plane to land in Red Square. Remember him?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathias_Rust

Not to live there though, just as a "symbol of peace".

I'm not sure it worked much as a symbol of peace. He got sent to a Soviet prison/interrogation for a while which I'm sure was a laugh a minute.

He was mentally disturbed, which kinda proves the point. After returning to Germany, he stabbed a woman for rejecting his advances. Later, he was convicted of shoplifting, and a few years after that he was convicted again of selling stolen goods.

Definitely a "character", even if medically sound enough to stand trial.

I didn't know about the stabbing bit. You'd have to be off your head to land a plane next to the Kremlin. He was lucky he wasn't shot down.

Yes he was so cool. The plane is still in a museum.

PS: He was dumb as hell too of course, and it was only due to incredible laxness of the air force that he was never shot down.

I'm not sure any countries really shoot down light aircraft unless it's an active war zone. They are not much of a threat and it's also hard to tell if they are there legally or not.

You're more likely to get hassled when you land like the Ethan Guo guy (https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c04rql923kdo)

Guo must have been a few sandwiches short of a picnic to try and fly to Antarctica unaided as well. Three year ban from Chile isn't long.

This was the soviet union in a very tense time. If he hadn't been shot down he would have been forced down. But yes that would have been a more likely outcome, true.

PS: Don't forget the Soviets knowingly shot and killed an entire airliner full of people. I saw an interview with the fighter pilot later and he didn't even have remorse for what he was doing, "just following orders". What a monster. But that was pretty typical there. Anyone with a backbone questioning orders was already dying in a gulag.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servi%C3%A7os_A%C3%A9reos_Cruz...

If I were in the US I would certainly leave to a more socialist country. I could not live there. Even before Trump.

However there is a spectrum between it. I don't think either extreme is great, neither American unrestricted capitalism nor full-on communism. A balance of both is needed. I was a lot happier in the 80s when Holland was a lot more socialist. Less things to worry about, a safety net, cheap housing and schooling, still the ability to run your own business if you really wanted to. We had a great combination.

However the VVD neoliberals (who idolize America) have destroyed it over the last decades and there are so many huge problems now because they always went for the quick fix.

With full-on capitalism you get lots of disenfranchised people angry at not having any upward mobility, corporations just dump all over the citizens, and differences in wealth get insanely high. With full-on communism you end up with a surveillance hellscape and inhumane processes. The secret sauce is in between IMO.

What would you call the current surveillance hellscape and inhumane processes in the USA? Is that full-on communism?

Totalitarianism exists on both sides of the spectrum.

That is a non-answer.

I understood your question to be a rhetorical one.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com