Everyone affected by the laws passed have "skin in the game".
Someone renting an apartment and working a job in a community definitely has skin in the game in regards to local tax rates, building regulations, public amenities, etc.
Someone renting an apartment and working a job in a community definitely has skin in the game in regards to local tax rates, building regulations, public amenities, etc.
Everyone has skin in the game but some have way more.
Maybe those transient homeowners are the ones who shouldn't get to vote...
Obviously someone with a kid enrolled in school and locked into a long-term lease is not transient and has a comparable amount of skin in the game as a homeowner.
(I still disagree with your broader point, since I don't think you can meaningfully draw a "has skin in the game" line.)