Hacker News Reader

Comment by queuebert | Hacker News Reader

All things being equal, SF has some of the most desirable weather on the planet, so it will always have an high cost of living due to excess demand.

View on HN

How do you square this bizarre and obviously false hypothesis with all the times that San Francisco did not have high cost of living, had declining population, etc?

What is obviously false about it? You can't just assert things as true. That's why the Democrats keep losing.

(See what I did there?)

There are plenty of other places with equally great weather and no needles on the streets.

it's a great place to live and there will always be high demand.

there would be more supply if not for restrictive zoning laws. and more supply = lower prices

SF has a relatively high ratio of housing units to population compared to other cities in the US and a 9.7% vacancy rate. By the numbers, it has an oversupply of housing.

By just those numbers, sure.

How many are homeless?

What does the median worker spend in money and time commuting from somewhere further?

That is not a valid interpretation of the data. The ratio you cite, which is a pointless one, is mostly influenced by household size. SF has a relatively small household size compared to the state and nation. The vacancy rate you cite is also not a useful one that people generally understand. There were 19000 units for sale or rent during the last ACS survey, out of 418000 physical dwellings, and that's only 4.5% which is very low by historical standards.

housing units : population is not a very salient statistic

Reply on news.ycombinator.com