You’re treating disagreement as evidence of moral failure, then using that to retroactively justify the label. That’s not reasoning — it’s tribal sorting. You must exist in quite a bubble, a rapidly shrinking one.
You have the causality backwards. Your moral stance is abhorrent, therefore I disagree with you and want nothing to do with you. Not the other way around.
My moral stance is abhorrent to about 7% of the population who the other 93% want nothing to do with.
I'll get over it.
You've been listening to too much Fox News and Trump Truth Social posts if you think 93% of the population is bigoted racists.
No, 93% of the population want nothing to do with extreme left wing socialist mob politics.
You're making my point for me.
You can't dismiss other people's assessment of your politics just because they are different from yours. That makes no sense.