This took me a long time to work through:

1. People’s beliefs are strongly shaped by upbringing and social environment.

2. A belief feeling “natural” or common does not make it correct or benign.

3. What’s most commendable is the effort to examine and revise inherited beliefs, especially when they cause harm.

4. This framework lets me understand how any individual arrived at their views without endorsing those views.

I think this is why responses often split: some treat explanation as endorsement, others don’t. Both reactions are understandable, but the tension disappears once you treat explanation and moral evaluation as separate and compatible steps.