> If the architecture of my code doesn't enforce privacy and resistance to censorship by default

which is impossible.

- No code is feasibly guaranteed to be secure

- All code can be weaponized, though not all feasibly; password vaults, privacy infrastructure, etc. tend to show holes.

- It’s unrealistic to assume you can control any information; case-in-point the garden of Eden test: “all data is here; I’m all-powerful and you should not take it”.

I’m not against regulation and protective measures. But, you have to be prioritize carefully. Do you want to spend most of the world’s resources mining cryptocurrency and breaking quantum cryptography, or do you want to develop games and great software that solves hunger and homelessness?